An exciting chapter from “Attention the countdown is already running III” is available to interested readers – completely and free of charge ©. Because universal history teaches us that everything that does not fit into our world view or represents a danger for our perfect world is simply rejected or made contemptible, nevertheless we should slowly deal with what is really going on on our blue planet …

 

Enslaved brains or conscious being

Since the beginning of recorded history, humans have sought to control their fellow humans. The impulse to do so is probably a characteristic of man himself. For until our modern times, brute force, propaganda, and religion have been the most successful methods for manipulating people. But by the turn of the century, the variety of coercive measures had evolved far beyond the sword, the rousing slogan, and the carrot and stick scheme.

Now in the 21st century, scientists* paid by governments and other solvent interest groups have achieved technical breakthroughs that make actual mind control possible, and on a near universal scale. Invasion-like control techniques have been so finely tuned that the controllers are virtually able to get inside our heads. They are able to tamper with, manipulate and destroy our humanity whenever they want. They are able to use high-tech networks of electronic influence and broadcasting, the procedures of which have not even been faintly hinted at in the mass media.

And the subject of mind control? Well, that was simply brought into connection with science fiction by the media. But this very science fiction has long since found its way into certain scientific institutes.
One such institute is the Intelli-Connection, a security division of IBM located at 1200 Progress Way, Amonk, New York. This department is predominantly concerned with crime control and security within reformatories. Mind control is virtually their daily endeavor, and people in detention centers they view as material to be transformed.

Here is an internal and classified report from the company from 2015:

Crime control will be a predominant issue in the future. We must be ready with our security products, such as the 2020 Neutral Chip Implant, when the demand for them comes to light. Our research and development department has been under contract with the federal Bureau of Prisons, the California Department of Corrections, the Texas Department of Public Safety, and the Massachusetts Department of Corrections to conduct limited trials of the 2020 Neural Chip Implant. We have placed representatives of our interests in these agencies at both the management and administrative levels. Regulations by federal law do not allow testing of implants on prisoners, but we have been able to conduct contract testing of our products. We have also had greater success with implant technology in privately managed sanitariums. However, we need to expand our testing to explore how effective the 2020 neural chip implant proves to be in those who are considered the most aggressive members of our society. The limited testing has already produced a number of results.

There are some interesting images about this at www.neuralink.com.

In California, some detainees were identified as members of a security threat group (EME) or Mexican Mafia. They were taken to the Health Services Unit in Pelican Bay and sedated with advanced sedatives manufactured in our laboratories in Cambridge Massachusetts. The implantation procedure takes 60 to 90 minutes, depending on the experience of the technician. We are working on a device that will reduce this time by up to 60%.

The results of the implants in 8 prisoners showed the following:

• The implants served as a monitoring and observation device for the activities of the threatening group.
• The implants incapacitated two subjects during an attack on the reformatory staff.
• Comprehensive side effects in all 8 subjects showed that when set to 116 MHz, the implant made all subjects lethargic and they slept an average of 18-22 hours per day.
• All subjects refused rest breaks for 14 days during the evaluation of the 116 MHz test.
• 7 of 8 subjects did not exercise, either in or out of the cell.
• 5 of the 8 subjects refused to shower for up to three consecutive days.
• Each subject was observed for aggressive activity during the test period and the results clearly show that 7 of 8 subjects showed no aggression – not even when provoked.
• Each subject had minor bleeding from the nose and ears 48 hours after implantation.
• None of the subjects knew about the implant during the test period and each implant was removed under the guise of medical treatment.

It should be noted that the testing period lasted less than two months. However, during this time important data was collected by our R&D team suggesting that the implants exceeded the expected results.
One of the more important concerns of the safety agency and the R&D team was that the subject would detect the chemical imbalance during the fitting period and the test would have to be stopped. However, due to advanced technological developments in compounds, the 48-hour adaptation period can be attributed to drug treatment that the subject received after implantation.
One of the points of concern expressed by the research and development team was the reason for the bleeding and how to eliminate the problem. Unexplained bleeding could cause the subject to ask further questions of their “routine” visit to the infirmary or other health care provider.
The yield in safety issues was tremendous because of the short testing period.
Security officials are now aware of some strategies employed by EME that facilitate the transfer of illegal drugs and weapons at their reformatory.
One intelligence officer noted that although they could not use the information gained in court, they now know who to watch and what outside connections they have.
Soledad Prison is now considering moving three subjects to Vacaville, where we have ongoing implantation research. Our technicians have promised they can complete three 2020 neural chip implantations in less than an hour. Soledad officials hope to get information from those three to bring a 14-month investigation into drug smuggling by reform school officials to a conclusion.
In essence, the implants turn an unknowing prisoner into a walking, talking recording device that accounts for every event it encounters. There are only five intelligence officers on the Correction Commission who actually know about the full extent of the implantation experiment.
In Massachusetts, the reformatory has already become a point of discussion at the highest levels because they are releasing certain lawbreakers with 2020 neural chip implants …

♦♦♦

Frightening, isn’t it? Unfortunately, the incident I mentioned is only one of countless tests in which the people concerned were not asked or were completely unaware that they were being abused as guinea pigs, so to speak. I have several other reports of people who have had tiny implants inserted without their knowledge. However, I do not want to overburden this chapter and therefore only report on the best documented cases. One of these reports is about Robert Naeslund:

He reports that in 1967, while undergoing surgery in Stockholm, Sweden, he was implanted with a mind control device. According to Robert Naeslund, the implant was placed by Dr. Curt Strand, and took the form of an injection through a nostril. Robert Naeslund then contacted the Swedish Health and Welfare Board and protested the experimentation during his surgery, which was done without his consent. However, when doctors heard his story, he was predictably declared confused and treated accordingly. Nevertheless, Robert Naeslund showed the X-rays of his head to several Swedish doctors, but even these gentlemen were unanimous in their opinion that everything was normal.

It was not until 1983, after Professor P. A. Lindstrom of the University of California reviewed the X-rays, that it was officially confirmed that some foreign bodies were visible in his brain. After that, things moved amazingly fast until 10 more doctors came forward to confirm Professor Lindstrom’s assessment. As a result, Robert Naeslund submitted a petition with 50 signatures to the Swedish Director of Public Prosecutions in 1985, informing about the implantation. At the same time, he demanded that this procedure be stopped. Robert Naeslund was also one of several people responsible for an advertisement appearing in 30 different newspapers exposing the situation of mind control in Sweden. However, the whole matter was very gradually forgotten, so that ultimately no change has taken place.
Quite the opposite, in fact, as our neuroscientists tinkered with even more treacherous and exotic methods to find the ultimate means of control. Therefore, it is not surprising if exotic questions were also posed, such as:

What if we could edit human sensations or insert images into brains that the person has never seen?

These are precisely the questions currently being asked by our neuroscientists, who are working on a technology for sensory illusion. The technology in question is designed to transmit information directly to the brain with the help of laser light. This kind of illusion is as interesting as it is creepy because mediating organs (eyes – ears, …) are removed from the perception equation and the simulation information is fed directly into the brain. This makes virtual experiences indistinguishable from reality. The method has already been successfully tested on mice at Berkeley University.
The researchers rely on optogenetics (genetically modified cells in the brain are remotely controlled with the help of light signals). What is frightening is that the researchers have developed a very precise method of controlling light that makes it possible to activate individual cells on an individual basis. In plain language, this means that brain activities of any kind can be recorded, copied exactly and transferred to any brain at any time.

The researchers call this a “holographic projection.” This means that the recipients of the copied brain signals have the same sensations as in a real experience. According to science, these light-sensitive cells can be activated about 50 times or more per second, which should correspond to normal neuron firing rates of the brain. However, this also raises the legitimate question of how our scientists come up with holographic projections when we talk about the human brain?
Of course, this topic was not tackled by accident, as brain researcher and Stanford University quantum physicist Karl Pribram has long been plagued by a tricky question:

How and where are memories stored in the brain?…

Through numerous experiments he found that the brain is indeed holographic. Furthermore, he was able to prove that all our memories, actions, interactions, etc. pass through the entire brain encoded in patterns of impulses, i.e. do not have their fixed place in the neurons as previously assumed. Physicist David Bohm, who researches quantum mechanics and relativity at Princeton University, also came to this conclusion.

But not only these two brilliant scientists dealt with the topic “holographic brain”, because on April 27, 2015 the Technical University of Vienna published via a press release (49/2015) an article with the headline:

Is the universe a hologram?

For three years, Daniel Grunmiller and his team at TU Wien, together with the University of Edinburgh, Havard University, MIT and Kyoto University, have been researching gravitational models on the topic of the correspondence principle.
In this press release, they confirm the validity of the correspondence principle in a “flat universe.” Their calculations now confirm the assumption that the holographic principle can also be realized in “flat” domains. This result solves a previous obstacle on the way to the acceptance of a holographic universe, because this discovery derives a high probability for the actual existence of a holographic universe from latest measurement results.
Everyone surely knows the holograms on credit cards or banknotes. The image that appears to us as three-dimensional is actually two-dimensional. According to the latest studies, our universe has a very similar structure. Researchers at the Vienna University of Technology believe that a mathematical description of the universe actually requires one dimension less than previously assumed. Because what we perceive in three dimensions is ultimately only the image of two-dimensional processes on a huge cosmic horizon.
The now published results of scientists from the Vienna University of Technology indicate that this holographic model also exists in a flat spacetime.

If we now add the research results of the article “The spook has an end” of Albert Einstein to the results of Daniel Grunmiller, then these two publications seem to complement each other. Because it is about the topic of quantum entanglement. The significant thing about entangled particles is that they are in a common quantum state. Thus, the latest results also contribute to an ever-increasing probability that we actually live in a holographic universe.

♦♦♦

It may be that these latest research results of brain researchers also represent a blessing for mankind, since in this way severe traumas, brain damage caused by accidents, or disabilities in the brain regions given from birth can be repaired for the benefit of those affected.

But what if all this is misused for power purposes?

What if today we no longer know what actually happened yesterday, because virtual images have been projected directly into our brains, which we register as real and genuine through our sensation?

Will I then be reached by reports such as “Will science soon be able to erase memories?” (Galileo/issue 6, 2019), I do get a bit of a shiver, even though this report emphasizes the positive side of erasing memories.

Victims of terrorist attacks, rapes and kidnappings are certainly helped by reconsolidation of memories, as the method is called in professional circles, however, we know all too well that many a positive invention has been misused for military purposes. Even though this process “merely” blocks neurons with the drug propranonol, it is a method that certainly has the potential to be efficiently refined.

Even a report on the Internet at www.getastral.de/eine-außerkörperliche-Erfahrung-simulieren on 20.10.2019 clearly shows that our science is working at full speed in the field of virtually generated images. Since out-of-body experience is a concept to science, but until now any evidence and explanations about it were missing, a team of researchers from Washington has decided to find answers. In doing so, they came up with an ingenious test:

The simulation of an out-of-body experience.

In fact, they succeeded in creating the illusion of being outside their body in all test subjects, because the senses of the test subjects were deceived to such an extent that their brain automatically believed to be outside their body.

Test procedure:
Video goggles were connected to two cameras, with one camera image projected onto the right eye and the other camera image projected onto the left eye. The cameras were placed behind the test subjects in such a way that they could see their own backs from behind. This created the illusion of standing behind one’s own body. After only a few seconds, this illusion became very familiar to the consciousness and it felt this to be real.
The experience was even more amazing when the subjects were touched with a stick in the chest area and at the same time the same movement was made with a stick in front of the camera. Due to this sensory illusion, the test subjects thought they were being touched with the stick in front of the camera.
The researchers went even further in this test and maltreated the visual image with hammer blows. The subjects reacted to this visual danger with a measurable panic; they had the feeling of really being attacked. Even with a “knife cut” on the visual image, their brains signaled real danger, because: The brain cannot distinguish.

Henrik Ehrsson, who works at University College London and Karolinska Institute Stockholm and was also involved in this experiment, started a similar experiment. A rubber hand was attached to the test subject instead of the real hand, while it was connected to an instrument that can measure brain waves (EEG). It was then checked how the subject’s brain reacted to stimuli on the rubber hand. The results were startling: the subject’s brain accepted the fake hand as its own and felt with the rubber hand. Touch was signaled and attacks irritated the protective mechanism.

Again, consciousness was not fixed on the real body, proving that body and consciousness are separate.

A similar phenomenon occurs in a situation familiar to everyone: the falling asleep of body parts. This numbness can progress to the point where movements are no longer mediated to the body part in question. Mostly this happens at night, when one suddenly wakes up and realizes that the complete arm has fallen asleep. When touching it, the asleep arm is often perceived as a foreign body, and after shifting the arm, it seems as if it is still in its previous position.

On the basis of these and other tests science could prove that out-of-body experiences are possible and that

body and consciousness are clearly separated from each other.

But “virtual and augmented reality” are not yet one hundred percent mature, yet Silicon Valley researchers are already working on a direct connection between the brain and the computer.

One of the most colorful, but also most ingenious figures in this field is Elon Musk. Elon Reeve Musk was born in Pretoria on June 28, 1971, according to WIKIPEDIA, and is a Canadian-US entrepreneur from South Africa. He is known for his involvement in the creation of the online payment system PayPal, as well as with the private space company SpaceX and the electric car manufacturer Tesla.

In 1995, Musk co-founded his first company, Zip2, with his brother Kimbal, which provided content for media companies. According to Musk, at the time he had “a vague idea of the opportunities that a DOT COM company, $2,000 in capital, a car and a computer could provide.” When computer manufacturer Compag bought the company for $307 million in 1999, it was the highest price paid for an Internet company up to that time; Musk himself was subsequently able to access $22 million in capital through his investment.

X.com and PayPal (1999/2000)
Immediately afterwards, Musk founded X.com in 1999, which developed an online payment system via e-mail. As early as 2000, X.com merged with rival company Confinity, which specialized in a similar product called PayPal. PayPal became the most important online payment system in the world in the following years – and generated sales proceeds of $1.5 billion when it was sold to eBay in 2002. Musk held 11.7% of the company’s shares at that time, making him the largest shareholder. In July 2017, he reacquired the x.com domain from PayPal.

While Musk’s Internet ventures opened up new markets with products that had not previously existed in this form, the business idea that would underlie the entrepreneurial activities of the following years was different: He wanted to make expensive and technically complex products more affordable and suitable for mass production.

SpaceX (2002)
Musk’s third startup was the SpaceX aerospace company in 2002 – making him CEO and rocket chief designer. Through high cost efficiency, SpaceX became the world’s leading commercial provider of orbital rocket launches within 15 years, especially for transporting satellites into Earth orbit. In addition, SpaceX has been supplying the ISS space station with the Dragon spacecraft since 2012. Its successor, Crew Dragon, made its first manned flight to the ISS in May 2020. Russia accused Musk of deliberately trying to push Russian space shuttles out of the market by discounting them. A curious fallout in 2019 was that the deputy director general of Roskosmos was banned from quoting Musk at official events.

Neuralink (2016)
In July 2016, Musk founded Neuralink, a company investigating ways to connect the human brain with machines, though his involvement in Neuralink was not revealed until March 2017. At the same time, however, it was emphasized that the research project would still be in its early stages so far. However, just in the last few years, he made tremendous progress in his plan to connect the human brain with computers.
The billionaire presented to the astonished experts the prototype of a device of his company Neuralink, which can transmit information between neurons and a smartphone – in a pig.

In the future, it would be conceivable to bridge injured nerve tissue with the help of the technology, for example so that people could walk again, Musk reports. The prototype is equipped with temperature, pressure and motion sensors, among other things: The device could therefore monitor health and, for example, warn of a risk of heart attack or stroke. The mini-computer in the head is supposed to communicate via Bluetooth radio with an app on the smartphone.

During his presentation, Musk showed a pig in which impulses are transmitted from the trunk. Every time pig Gertrude touched something with it, electrical signals were visible on a screen. With a pig on a treadmill, information from the device could be used by software to predict fairly accurately when which joint would be activated.

In addition to the health aspect, there are also plans to use the device to store and replay memories in the future. But the costs were also discussed at the presentation. Musk expects to be able to reduce these over time – including surgery – to a few thousand dollars. It is not yet clear when the prototype will go into series production.

I can’t help but feel a chill down my spine when I look at this development. A mini-computer in my brain? No matter what possible advantages this device would bring me, it removes me from being human. Lets me become a controllable “something”. Where would the limit be? How much human would be left in this development? Can we still stop this development? Probably difficult, because in addition to Musk, about 60 researchers* are working at Facebook on an ultimate interface that is capable of dictating human thoughts to computers. However, our neuroscientists are also looking at results in the direction of the “superhuman”. He would be able to perceive magnetic fields or to extend the field of vision considerably. Even more, he would be able to read thoughts.

However, anyone who believes that chip implants are pure dreams of the future is very much mistaken. RIFD implants in the human body have long been in use. Human surveillance is therefore already taking place.

♦♦♦

Electronic human control

RFID implants in the human body were deemed harmless by health authorities years ago and have since been used in animals and humans. However, the voices of critics will not be silenced, insisting that the potential risks have not been adequately studied. In animal studies, the small microwave transmitters led to increased cancer risk when implanted.

Humans with chip implants are no longer a vision. Because these radio chips will flood our bodies in the future. Recently, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved implantable chips for medical applications for the first time after a two-year approval phase. Each of these so-called Verchips is the size of a grain of rice and contains a unique 16-digit code number. Linked to a database, this ID can then be used to query various data records. To use the radio chips, not even a doctor is needed. The RFID chips are expected to have a service life of 100 years.

The GPS chip allows the owner to be located at any time and anywhere via satellite.

The chip implanted in the arm is supposed to be intended for the safety of particularly vulnerable people (hard to believe) or also to reduce the risk of kidnapping, for example. When the chip is no longer needed, for example when the owner retires, it can easily be deactivated with a special deactivation device.

RFID as a talking denture prosthesis
A unique serial number in dentures, bridges and crowns should prevent errors by dental laboratories and facilitate repairs. On top of that, RFID technology is expected to increase productivity. Until now, problems have arisen when prosthesis data is passed from one dental technician to another. RFID technology is expected to remedy this situation: A reader makes it possible to store every change made to the denture in a database and on the chip itself. This means that all operations can be traced if there are any problems. Two Belgian dentists are even going one step further: they want to replace the identity card with a microchip between inlays and crowns in the dentures. RFID chips with a size of 6 millimeters could then, for example, make it much easier to identify dead people (such as victims of natural disasters, etc.).

Digital piercing to make everyday life easier
Future generations of people may integrate sparking computer chips into their bodies as a matter of course. The aim is to make daily life easier. Radio chips implanted in both hands can, for example, be used to open locks, control house lighting or secure a safe without contact or visual contact. Or, for example, coffee is brewed immediately when you enter the kitchen. Or the following situation: “Without money in the supermarket?” No problem: just flex your biceps briefly and the smiling cashier scans your arm – the RFID chip is recognized and the purchase is paid for. At the Baja Beach Club in Barcelona, guests can already have an RFID chip implanted in their upper arm.

RFID as a virtual medical record
In conjunction with appropriate sensors, the radio chips can constantly provide the doctor with valuable information (e.g. blood pressure, pulse or body temperature) about the patient’s state of health. The aim is to give the attending physician rapid access to information about the patient’s medical history.

Big Brother – total surveillance has become reality with the RFID chip
At the national security center in Mexico, RFID chips with GPS tracking systems have already been implanted in 168 employees. On the one hand, these chips serve as access keys to the high-security area, and on the other hand, they are capable of monitoring individual employees at every turn. The implant also allows tracking outside the workplace. This is intended to increase the perceived security of particularly high-ranking personnel, as kidnappings of people in important positions or from wealthy families occur time and again in Mexico. However, particularly dangerous prisoners or terrorists who have been released and are prepared to commit subsequent crimes can also be monitored with the help of an implanted RIFD GPS chip.

Mass control through biochips
By means of biochips implanted on the cerebral cortex, it will be possible to operate televisions and video recorders. Prisons will be superfluous because a prison-free society will prevail: criminals will no longer be locked up but prevented from committing further crimes by computer chips in their brains. Computer keyboards will be superfluous because computers can be operated by voice or with the help of an implanted biochip.

Many people today have reached the point where they see nothing wrong with this total technology, or even directly approve of and support it. Yet it is less than 100 years since the majority of humanity had the intuitive conviction that cutting up the landscape with rail lines and paved roads would cause unfortunate disruptions in nature. Now, just a few decades later, people are already submitting to total technological connectivity on all levels? This was not a random development, but a purposeful strategy.The solution is not a return to the Middle Ages, nor destructive technological progress, but a quantum leap into the cosmic consciousness of the post-technological age, in which people will once again be free from these dependencies.

It may seem strange to you in this context if I take a look at the Bible on this subject. More precisely into the revelation of John. But when studying this chapter, one discovers an enormous similarity to the topic just described, which cannot be dismissed out of hand.

Secret Revelation 13:16
The beast had all people in his power: high and low, rich and poor, slaves and free. They had to put a mark on their right hand or on their forehead so that no one could buy or sell except the one who had this mark: the name of the beast or the number of his name. Wisdom is needed here. He who has understanding can find out what the number of the beast means, because it stands for the name of a man. It is the number 666.

Can it be? That we are currently at the very beginning of this scenario? If so, wouldn’t it make sense to resist this disastrous dependency by critically questioning, cultivating being human and not immediately saying yes to every new technology?

But let me come back to the results of the Vienna University of Technology and apply their findings to our so-called reality. It is very important to know that a hologram has a special property:

Namely, if one directs a beam of light onto the hologram, then the light beam reflected from the hologram can create a three-dimensional image of the image information stored in the hologram. However, if you break the hologram into several parts, then you can see that each individual partial fragment of the hologram is capable of producing the entire 3-D image. The only thing that is lost in this case is the resolution or image sharpness, which decreases the smaller the partial fragment is.

If one considers this realization in relation to our perception of what we recognize around us and accept as real, then ultimately only one possibility remains, namely that we should rather imagine our reality as an image instead of a solid body construct.

The reality we see corresponds more to a three-dimensional projection, much like a shadow corresponds to the two-dimensional projection of a three-dimensional body. What makes it all so fascinating is the apparent direct communication of all the particles involved, which are at a great distance from each other. However, the theory of relativity that we are familiar with states that nothing can move faster in space than the speed of light. Experiments regarding a holographic brain, on the other hand, have shown that the information in our brain is exchanged without any time delay.

In order to make this phenomenon a little more understandable, I would like to fall back on an analogy.

Imagine a fish swimming in an aquarium and two video cameras are pointed at the fish from two different perspectives. The signals are displayed on two monitors in the next room. An observer who is not familiar with the experimental setup and is placed in front of the two monitors will initially think that they are two different fish. When “the fish” begin to move on the monitor, it appears as if “the fish” are communicating with each other to coordinate their movements. Only when the experimental setup is explained to the observer, it becomes clear that it is the same fish on both monitors.

In terms of our reality, this means that the three-dimensional reality in which we live is only the projection of a deeper reality. At the level of this deeper reality, communication can be instantaneous and without delay, because at this deeper level, particles are connected because they are part of the same hologram. This means that any separation we feel in our reality is based on a misconception and we are not aware of the togetherness on the deeper level.

By the way, this can also explain the apparent phenomenon of telekinesis. Because if it succeeds to access consciously the deep reality level on the mental level, then it is possible to have access to an object or to manipulate it before it is projected into our reality.

And yet, when asked what our physical world is made of, most would probably answer: matter and energy.

But modern achievements in technology, biology and physics show us that information is an equally important component of the world. A robot in a car factory can access supplies of metal and plastic – but it can’t do anything with them unless detailed instructions tell it which parts to put together and how.

 

A ribosome in a human body cell has amino acids as building material and is supplied with energy by the conversion of the energy storage molecule ATP into ADP – but without the information stored in the DNA of the cell nucleus, it is unable to synthesize proteins. And also in physics, the development of the last hundred years has shown us that information plays a crucial role in physical systems and processes.

There is even an interpretation of quantum theory, initiated by John A. Wheeler of Princeton University, according to which the physical world actually consists of information, while energy and matter are only surface phenomena. This view of things invites a new look at old questions, as the storage capacity of hard disks and other electronic devices grows by leaps and bounds.

• When and where will this progress end?
• What is the ultimate storage capacity of a device that weighs less than a gram and is no larger than a cubic centimeter – that is, about the size of a computer chip?
• How much information do we need to describe the entire universe?
• Could this description fit into the memory of a computer?
• So, as the English poet William Blake once wrote, could we recognize the world in a grain of sand? – Or is this idea just a figment of poetic imagination?
• Amazingly, recent developments in the field of theoretical physics actually answer some of these questions – and the answers provide us with important clues to a comprehensive theory of reality.

From the mysterious properties of black holes, for example, physicists have deduced an absolute upper limit to the information that can be contained in an area of space or in a given amount of matter and energy. This in turn supports the finding that our universe, which we perceive in three spatial dimensions, is actually written on a two-dimensional surface – like a hologram.

But how can we understand this?

Well, formal information theory emerged in 1948 with two seminal publications by American engineer and mathematician Claude E. Shannon. He introduced the most common measure of information content today: entropy (measure of ignorance).

Entropy has long been a central concept in thermodynamics, the branch of physics that deals with heat. In descriptive terms, thermodynamic entropy is a measure of disorder in a physical system.

More precisely, the Austrian physicist Ludwig Boltzmann defined entropy in 1877 by the number of different microscopic states that the particles of a piece of matter can assume without changing its macroscopic properties.

Applied to the air in a room, one would have to add up – for given values of pressure and temperature – all the possible configurations that the individual gas molecules in that room have in terms of location and velocity. In his search for a measure of the information content of a message, Shannon came up with a formula of the same shape as Ludwig Boltzmann’s definition of entropy.
Shannon’s entropy of a message is equal to the number of binary digits or bits required to encode it.
Shannon’s entropy tells us nothing about the value of a piece of information, which in any case depends heavily on context. But as an objective measure of the amount of information, its definition is immensely useful in science and engineering. For example, Shannon’s entropy plays an important role in the development of modern communication devices – whether cell phones, modems or CD players.

Thermodynamic and Shannon entropy are conceptually closely related: The number of possible arrangements collected in the Boltzmann entropy corresponds to the amount of Shannon information one would need to realize a particular arrangement.
However, there are significant differences between the two entropies. First, chemists or refrigeration engineers express thermodynamic entropy in units of energy divided by temperature, while computer scientists express Shannon entropy in dimensionless bits. This difference is more or less a matter of definition.
But even after conversion into common units, the typical magnitudes of the two entropies differ enormously. A microchip containing one gigabyte (10⁹ bytes) of data has a Shannon entropy of about 10¹⁰ bits, because one byte corresponds to eight bits. This is vanishingly small compared to the thermodynamic entropy of the chip, which is about 10²³ bits at room temperature. The gigantic difference arises because the two entropies are calculated for different degrees of freedom. A degree of freedom is any variable quantity in the system under consideration, e.g. one of the three spatial coordinates or one of the three velocity components of each particle.

But then what is the greatest possible information density?

The Shannon entropy of the chip takes into account only the overall state of each tiny transistor etched into the silicon crystal. The transistor is ON or OFF, in the ZERO or ONE state: it has a single binary degree of freedom.

Thermodynamic entropy, on the other hand, depends on the states of all the billions of atoms and free electrons that make up each transistor. With each step in miniaturization, however, the day comes a little closer when each atom will be able to store one bit of information for us – and at the same time, the usable Shannon entropy of the most advanced microchip in each case gradually approaches the thermodynamic entropy of the material. If both entropies are calculated for the same degrees of freedom, they are equal.

And what then are the ultimate degrees of freedom?

Well, atoms are made of electrons and nuclei, nuclei of protons and neutrons, and these in turn of quarks. Many physicists today believe that electrons and quarks are excited states of so-called superstrings, and assume that these are the most fundamental building blocks of nature. But the vicissitudes of a century of physical discoveries should warn us against dogmatism: there may be more levels of structure in the universe than our physical school wisdom would dream of. The ultimate information capacity of a piece of matter – in other words, its true thermodynamic entropy – cannot be calculated as long as the nature of the ultimate constituents of matter or the deepest structural level is not known. This ignorance causes no problems in practical thermodynamics. For the analysis of a car engine, for example, the properties of quarks do not matter, because under the relatively “peaceful” conditions of an internal combustion engine they do not change their state.

But given the breathtaking progress in miniaturization, one can imagine, in purely theoretical terms, the day when quarks will serve as information storage devices – perhaps one bit per quark. How much information would then fit into a cubic centimeter? And how much only if we could use superstrings or even deeper levels that have not even been hypothetically thought of so far?

Surprisingly, the development of gravitational physics over the last three decades has provided a number of clear answers to these seemingly staggering questions.

Black holes play a central role in this development. Their existence follows from general relativity, the geometric description of gravity formulated by Albert Einstein in 1915.
In this theory, gravity is ultimately nothing more than a curvature of space-time, causing objects to move as if a force were acting on them. This curvature, in turn, is caused by the presence of matter and energy. According to Einstein’s equations, a sufficiently dense accumulation of matter or energy curves spacetime to such an extent that it literally ruptures, forming a black hole.
The laws of relativity prohibit anything that has fallen into a black hole from ever coming out again – at least within the framework of classical physics, that is, without taking quantum effects into account. The critical boundary of the region from which there is no escape is called the event horizon. In the simplest case, it is a spherical surface whose radius is larger the more mass the black hole has.

It is impossible to find out what happens inside a black hole. No information can leave the event horizon and escape into the outside world. But when a piece of matter disappears forever in a black hole, it leaves certain traces. Its energy – because every mass corresponds to an energy according to Einstein’s formula E = mc2 and vice versa – is permanently noticeable as an increase in the mass of the black hole. If matter is captured while orbiting the black hole, its angular momentum is added to that of the black hole. Both the mass and angular momentum of a black hole can be measured by the effect on the surrounding space-time. In this way, black holes are also subject to the laws of conservation of energy and angular momentum. But another fundamental law, the Second Law of Thermodynamics, seems to be violated, because:

entropy is never lost.

The Second Law expresses the everyday observation that most natural processes are irreversible: a teacup falls off the table and breaks, but no one has ever seen shards that jump up on their own and assemble into a teacup. The Second Law of Thermodynamics prohibits such reversal processes. It states that the entropy of a closed physical system can never decrease; At best, it can remain constant, but most of the time it increases.

This statement is not only fundamental to physical chemistry and engineering, but perhaps the law of physics with the greatest significance outside of physics. As John A. Wheeler was the first to point out, with matter its entropy disappears, never to be seen again in the black hole, and the Second Law seems to be suspended.

In 1970, Demetrious Christodoulou (then a student of John A. Wheeler at Princeton) and Stephen W. Hawking of the University of Cambridge (England) independently provided the key to solving this riddle. They proved that in various processes, such as the merger of black holes, the total area of the event horizons never decreases.

When a star collapses into a black hole, its entropy far exceeds that of the star. In 1974, Hawking showed that black holes spontaneously emit thermal radiation, the so-called Hawking radiation, due to quantum effects. The Christodoulou-Hawking theorem fails in the face of this phenomenon, because the mass of the black hole decreases due to the radiation of energy, and thus its event horizon also shrinks. The Generalized Second Law, on the other hand, has no problem with Hawking radiation: the entropy of the released radiation more than compensates for the decrease in the entropy of the black hole.

In 1986, Rafael D. Sorkin of Syracuse University (New York) considered the property of the event horizon to prevent any information inside a black hole from influencing the events outside. He concluded that the Generalized Second Law – or a very similar law – must apply to every conceivable process that black holes can undergo. Rafael D. Sorkin’s profound reflection makes it clear that the entropy that goes into the Generalized Second Law actually encompasses all possible configurations up to the most fundamental level of the structure of matter, regardless of what that level may ultimately look like.

The constant of proportionality between the entropy of black holes and the area of their event horizon can be determined from the Hawking radiation: The entropy of a black hole is exactly equal to a quarter of its horizon area, measured in Planck areas. The Planck length is the fundamental unit of length for gravity and quantum mechanics; it is 10³³ centimeters. The Planck area is the square of the Planck length, i.e. 10⁶⁶ square centimeters. Even by the standards of thermodynamics, this results in immense entropy values. The entropy of a black hole just one centimeter in diameter would be 10⁶⁶ bits — equivalent to the thermodynamic entropy of a water cube ten billion kilometers across.

The Generalized Second Law allows us to determine upper limits for the information capacity of any closed physical system, which apply to all information on all structural levels – even on the so far undiscovered ones.

Leonard Susskind of Stanford University came up with a similar idea in 1995, called the holographic border. It denotes the maximum amount of entropy in a given volume containing matter and energy. In his work on the holographic boundary, Susskind considered any approximately spherical isolated mass that is not itself a black hole and fits within an A-size closed area. If the mass can collapse into a black hole, its horizon area is less than A and the black hole’s entropy is consequently less than A/4. Since the entropy of the system must not decrease according to the Generalized second law, the original entropy of the mass cannot have been greater than A/4. This means that the entropy of a closed system with an interface A must be less than A/4.

But what if the mass does not spontaneously collapse?

As science showed in 2000, a tiny black hole can be used to transform the system into a black hole little different from the one in Susskind’s theory. The limit is thus independent of the composition of the system or the nature of the most fundamental building blocks. It depends exclusively on the Generalized second law. With that, we can now answer some of the tricky questions about the ultimate limits of information capacity: A device with a diameter of one centimeter can in principle store up to 10⁶⁶ bits – an unimaginable amount. The visible universe contains at least 10¹⁰⁰ bits of entropy, which could in principle fit into a sphere a tenth of a light-year across. But since it is difficult to estimate the entropy of the universe, much larger values are quite plausible; they might require a sphere almost as big as the universe itself.

In 1980, science began to study the first such limit, the so-called universal entropy limit. It indicates the maximum amount of entropy that can be contained in a given mass of given dimensions.

One aspect of the holographic boundary is particularly striking: the maximum possible entropy depends on the interface rather than the volume. Suppose we pile up memory chips in a big pile. The number of transistors – the total storage capacity – grows with the volume of the cluster.
The same applies to the total thermodynamic entropy of all chips. But amazingly, the theoretical ultimate information capacity of the volume filled by the cluster only increases with the size of the surface. Because the volume grows faster than the surface area, the chips’ total entropy must eventually exceed the holographic limit. Then, it seems, either the Generalized Second Law fails, or our notions of entropy and information capacity collapse. In fact, it is the cluster itself that is collapsing: before reaching critical size, it collapses under its own gravity into a black hole. After that, each additional memory chip increases the mass and the horizon area of the black hole, as it should be according to the generalized second law. The surprising finding that the information capacity depends on the size of the surface finds its natural explanation in the “holographic principle” which the Nobel Prize winner Gerard’t Hooft from the University of Utrecht (Netherlands) established in 1993 and which Leonard Susskind further developed.

In our everyday world, a hologram is a special type of photograph that produces a three-dimensional image when illuminated in the right way. All of the information needed to describe the three-dimensional scene is encoded as a pattern of light and dark areas on the two-dimensional film.

The holographic principle states that something analogous applies to the complete physical description of any system lying in a three-dimensional domain. There is therefore another physical theory, defined only on the two-dimensional interface of the field, which completely describes the three-dimensional physics. If a three-dimensional system can be fully expressed by a physical theory that operates only on its two-dimensional boundary, then the information content of the system should not exceed that of the description on the boundary.

After these quite comprehensive results, considered on a scientific level, the legitimate question arises:

Can we apply the holographic principle to the universe as a whole?

We know the real universe is a four-dimensional system: more specifically, it has spatial volume and extends in time. Thus, if the physics of the universe is holographic, then an alternative set of physical laws valid on a three-dimensional boundary of space-time must exist that is equivalent to the four-dimensional physics we know.

We still don’t know of any three-dimensional theory that achieves something like this. And what should serve us as the limit of the universe? A first step in testing these ideas is to study simplified models of the universe.

An example of such models are the so-called Anti-de Sitter spacetimes. In 1917, the Dutch astronomer Willem de Sitter developed the original De Sitter model as a solution to Einstein’s equations with an additional repulsive force, the “cosmological constant”.
De Sitter spacetime is empty, highly symmetric, and expanding at an accelerated rate. In 1997, studying distant supernova explosions, astronomers concluded that the expansion of our universe is accelerating (Spektrum der Wissenschaft3/2001, p. 30). This is probably why our cosmos will increasingly resemble a De Sitter model in the future. If one now replaces the repulsion in Einstein’s equations with an attraction, one obtains the Anti-de Sitter spacetime, which is just as symmetrical. What is important for the holographic principle is that this spacetime has a limit that is “in infinity” and is very similar to our ordinary spacetime.

Well and good, you will now say, but at the same time ask the question:

How many dimensions do we live in then?

Well, using Anti-de Sitter spacetime, theorists have developed a concrete example of the operation of the holographic principle: A universe described by superstring theory with anti-de Sitter spacetime is completely equivalent to a quantum field theory based on the boundary operates in this space-time. Thus, in an Anti-de Sitter universe, the complete superstring theory is fully mapped to the boundary of this spacetime.

In 1997, Juan Maldacena, who was then working at Harvard University in Cambridge (Massachusetts), first suggested such a relationship for the case of a five-dimensional anti-de Sitter model. Edward Witten from the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton and Steven S. Gubser, Igor R. Klebanov and Alexander M. Polyakov from Princeton University later confirmed this assumption and found further examples of the holographic principle in space-times of different dimensions.

This means that two apparently completely different theories – which do not even hold in spaces of the same dimension number – are equivalent. Intelligent residents of one of these universes would not be able to distinguish whether they live in a five-dimensional cosmos described by string theory or in a four-dimensional world to which point-particle quantum field theory applies.

Of course, the structure of their brains could impose a massive bias in favor of either of these descriptions—just as our innate “common sense” constructs the perception that our universe has three spatial dimensions.

In principle, the holographic equivalence can be used to simplify a complicated problem, such as the behavior of quarks and gluons, by moving it from the four-dimensional frontier spacetime into the highly symmetric five-dimensional anti-de Sitter spacetime. This also works the other way around. Thus, Witten was able to show that a black hole in an anti-de Sitter spacetime turns into hot radiation if one goes to alternative physics on the frontier spacetime. The entropy of the black hole – still a deeply mysterious concept – merges into the well-known entropy of radiation.

In 1999, Raphael Bousso, then a researcher at Stanford University, proposed a modified holographic boundary that has been shown to work in situations where previously defined boundaries fail.
Bousso’s reasoning begins with any suitable two-dimensional surface; it can be closed in the form of a sphere or open like a sheet of paper. A short light pulse now emanates from one side of this surface – from all points simultaneously and perpendicularly to the surface. All that is required is that the light rays first converge (approach each other).

For example, light emitted from the inner surface of a sphere satisfies this condition. Now consider the entropy of the energy and matter traversed by the imaginary rays of light – but only until they begin to intersect. Bousso conjectured that this entropy could not be greater than the entropy of the original area – i.e. a quarter of this area in Planck units. This is a different method of determining entropy than the original holographic limit. Bousso’s limit does not refer to the entropy of an entire region at a certain point in time, but to the sum of local entropies at different times: All sub-regions that are “illuminated” by the surface flash are counted. Bousso’s limit contains other entropy limits than special cases, but avoids their disadvantages. Both the universal entropy limit and the holographic limit according to Gerard ‘t Hooft and Leonard Susskind can be derived from the Bousso limit for isolated systems that are not rapidly changing and do not contain strong gravitational fields. When these constraining conditions are violated—as in the case of a collapsing sphere of matter already inside a black hole—then those limits break, while Bousso’s limit still applies. Bousso has also shown that his strategy can be used to locate the two-dimensional surfaces on which to place holograms of the world. Overall, researchers have proposed many other entropy limits…

The variety of variations on the holographic theme shows that it has by no means reached the status of a physical law. But while we don’t fully understand the holographic way of thinking, it does seem to have a future. If so, the belief that field theory is the ultimate language of physics, which has prevailed for fifty years, must give way to new ideas.

Perhaps holography will point the way to a fundamental theory. What could she look like?

Some researchers, notably Lee Smolin of the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics in Waterloo (Canada), conclude from the holographic approach that a definitive theory will deal neither with fields nor with objects in spacetime, but with the exchange of information between physical processes. This would be the ultimate triumph of the idea that the world is made up of information.

Conclusion: The world is already in the state of science fiction.

And there are no longer any limits to human control, which is exerted on the population by the technology that currently exists. The only delay left is in applicability. It is true that there will still be some fine tuning, polishing, and distribution of the technology that may take place in the years to come. There will also be new developments that will bring together the different existing technologies. And there will be strategies to get people to accept the “mark.”

But total control is no longer a nightmare.

Wait a little longer and the war for mind control will be won or lost.

The key to understanding mind control is understanding the possibilities of life itself, and that may be the salvation for the people of this planet. For mind control is a diminishing process by which a life unit is reduced in power until it is placed under the control of the manipulating force. It is a means by which man is transformed into an animal or a machine. The need is obvious.

It is a challenge for us to free ourselves and those around us from all the different types of mind control that are currently shaping and influencing our lives (television, advertising, schooling, religious indoctrination, political correctness,…).

We have it in our own hands. For at one end of the scale is the psychically conditioned animal, the man reduced in intellect, and at the other end of the scale of possibilities open to mankind there is no limitation.

Although it may be a controversial opinion, I believe that once human beings have been progressively freed from limiting beliefs and delusions, their potential is limitless. Because all of this content is ultimately telling them that they are unfortunate beings who must carry out the Controllers’ wishes. Technology can indeed be used to destroy the limits of human freedom, but the other part of the challenge is using technology in the work of liberation.

At the end of the day,

any barriers that can be placed on our Evolution, be eliminated,

because all limitations on human freedom are determined by the mind control has been imposed.